An Ontological Win-Win Model for Requirements Negotiation: Visual Decision-Making Aid for Software Development Teams
نویسنده
چکیده
Requirements negotiation in the domain of software development often runs into communication obstructions caused by the different worlds in which software engineers in software development firms and project managers in client firms exist. Toward a solution to situations of this kind, Grünbacher’s Easy Win-Win model presents a limited reformulation of the general win-win approach, which emphasises the collaborative construction of a common lexicon, or dictionary of agreed-upon terms with definitions. An ontological model also exists in conceptual form, representing a philosophically informed approach to reducing complex points of interpretation to visual imagery, with the potential for a more intuitive basis for common understanding than that afforded by a lexicon. This paper presents an augmented version of Grünbacher’s Easy Win-Win model for application specifically within the context of software requirements negotiation, to support future testing to assess its effect on communication effectiveness and efficiency.
منابع مشابه
Conceptual Design Model based Requirements Analysis in the WinWin Framework for Concurrent Requirements Engineering1
The WinWin framework provides a domain independent framework for the stakeholders to collaborate and negotiate in the requirements engineering phase of the software lifecycle. Requirements engineering in the framework leads to defining a win-win requirements model expressed using a set of conceptual elements that record stakeholder’s objectives, constraints, concerns and negotiated agreements. ...
متن کاملA Model for Decision Maintenance in the WinWin Collaboration Framework1
Cost-effective engineering and evolution of complex software must involve the different stakeholders concurrently and collaboratively. The hard problem is providing computer support for such collaborative activities. The WinWin approach being developed and experimented at the USC Center for Software Engineering provides a domain independent solution for the stakeholders to cooperate in the requ...
متن کامل1. The WinWin Approach: Using a Requirements Negotiation Tool for Rationale Capture and Use
A highly cost-effective approach for rationale capture and management is to provide automated support, and capture the resulting artifacts of the process by which software and system requirements and solutions are negotiated. The WinWin process model, equilibrium model, and collaborative negotiation tool provide capabilities for capturing the artifacts. The MBASE software process model provides...
متن کاملWinWin Requirements Negotiation Processes: A Multi-Project Analysis
Fifteen 6-member-teams were involved in negotiating requirements for multimedia software systems for the Library of the University of Southern California. The requirements negotiation used the Stakeholder WinWin success model and the USC WinWin negotiation model (Win Condition-Issue-Option-Agreement) and groupware system. The negotiated results were integrated into a Life Cycle Objectives (LCO)...
متن کاملUsing Constraint Programming for the Automatic Detection of Conflicts in Quality Requirements
Requirements negotiation is quite an interesting, ongoing research area. Current requirements engineering models usually propose a negotiation process with similar methods and goals. Unfortunately, only a few have partial automatic support. In this paper, we revisit one of the most mature models, Boehm’s Win–Win model. Win–Win is a qualitative, process–oriented model so that it is specially sui...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014